What is the bottom line? What is the point the author is trying to make in this
reading? What is their thesis/ their argument?
Roseanne Barr discusses her difficulty in keeping her perspective, and feministic
views while in Hollywood.
This article displayed the pressures of remaining true to your self identity in Hollywood. In an atmosphere where many in Hollywood change who they are to become popular Roseanne, showed how she rose above it and stayed true to herself.
What I liked about this article is it showed Roseanne's strength not only a
person but as a female as well.
In the article Roseanne mentions an argument she had with Matt over a line change. Matt wanted Roseanne's character to say something along the lines of“You’re my equal in bed, but that’s it.” Instead of conforming to the boss, she argued for hours because she believed her character would not say that. In the end she won against Matt. This argument was empowering because she did not and refused to back down.
It was a great feeling that she never settled while filming the show. It
makes me wonder what the show would have been, if she would be like
Margaret Cho and change to please. Would the show be the same success? Also
Roseanne claims that her show, is the last feminist and working-class-family
sitcom. However, I beg to differ. I believe that the ABC television program THE
MIDDLE displays the same, modern, and feministic approach Roseanne had. Can
anyone else think of a program similar to Roseanne? Or is her show the only
feminist and working-class-family sitcom?